The Journey of a Movement tends to be defined by specific steps.
A charismatic leader or figureheads present a new and transcendent idea that promises a panacea for alienated and vulnerable people.
And so it goes. Preparations are underway to challenge the establishment down in Brisbane. The gunships are circling. Conflict emerges from the out-houses. An isolated player, naked, shivering, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET displayed prominently as a statement, has come staggering from the field and is being led away in secrecy towards an inconclusive loan stint at Derbyshire.
Do you recall the early days, when the world was still young? The era of early Bazball, of Bazball without brains.
Cult leaders guarantee a new start, optimism ahead, support, success together with shared faith in the method.
How did it feel at first? A team united feeling good. Tattoos. Muscles. Determination. Peak performance vibes. Oh sure, England’s players will claim it’s not a real term, amusingly as it’s denied, what did we see?
However, everyone understands what it is. It’s Harry Brook executing a stroke so unconventional it has to be pixelated. It’s the excitement of the captain at his peak, an expression conveying: thoughtful warrior, strong features, hair woven from beaver hide, truly contemporary you half-expect to look down and see him playing on the ground stripped to the waist and cradling a wild salmon.
It’s the opener continuing to have permission addressing the media, appearing as a joyful figure formally attired, uttering phrases such as we’re challenging norms. Indeed, the energy, for a significant period, was uplifting.
Building period. Togetherness strengthened via memorization of mantras. These ideas are often illogical as a loyalty check.
Does anyone else feel? The reaction, the anger, the feeling of letdown post-defeat seems too strong, too much. The batting collapsed in Perth, as history shows. They were torn apart defensively during a brief period when tactics failed, carved around by the opponent batting like England but better, responsive to the situation, an athlete shining with a kind of light around him.
Currently, we see the criticism, the rage, the perception of the team as a kind of abomination. The consensus is that losing isn’t enough, they must be humbled, to be scoured, obliterated, overwhelmed via traditional methods of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the conventional tactics of the veteran, out there celebrating his wickets with a bashful smile similar to getting a nice new fishing rod. How will they respond?
Issues emerge due to setbacks. But the cult cannot admit errors. It starts to feed on hatred of the outside world.
Ultimately, approaching the upcoming game, we have now reached an intriguing moment in the lifespan of this movement. They might succeed overseas in a blur of adrenal disruption. More likely, they could lose just as quickly. And if they do lose it seems we could be witnessing the final stage.
Before that happens, a couple of points to note on the topic. More than two years ago, back in those heady early days, of optimism and energy, I wrote an article suggesting Bazball was a cult. Criticism followed, which demonstrated as it’s known a method to show something definitely isn’t a cult is if supporters react defensively rejecting criticism of the beliefs.
The developments in the last few days are fascinating. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. Online outrage is widespread, angry English pundits, shots of angry middle-aged supporters abroad disappointed by the short match, like a room full of investors demanding recourse.
On the other hand, there is the broader context of the host’s complex more culturally hard-wired exasperation towards the unconventional visitors, claiming, your cherished traditions and have developed to distinguish yourselves from the opposition, well, it’s all a bit of a gag ultimately.
Here lies the truth. All movements are similar. Bazball was a cult as the game has its own culture. In fact, English cricket has always been a cult, a group, a private event, a closed world with centuries of tradition and mystery supporting it. It has long been where entry is limited. It’s the British pastime of England, the early image-makers. And guess what, Britain is itself a cult, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a royal family remains.
The team have been isolated within this world from a young age. In trying to escape from it, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their past, building another enclosure, a limited community, but doing it this time with 15 cool guys and a coach encouraging individuality as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.
Live where your feet are. Run towards the danger. However much you change, you’re always basically in the same place.
With this mind, it might be appropriate to offer compassion for the movement, to acknowledge its merits, that are numerous. How to define it? Creating a sense of freedom. Questioning traditions. Batting aggressively|Attacking with
A digital strategist and tech writer with over a decade of experience covering emerging trends in the UK's online landscape.